It’s Good To Have Some Skin in the Game

put-some-skin-in-the-game-mortgage-lendersWay too many years ago, when I first started in the mortgage business, the emphasis was still on loan originations. But, it was also on the loan’s ongoing performance.

Lenders originated but most also serviced the loans they made. Independent Mortgage Lenders and some Banks originated government loans that were sold into Ginnie Mae pools. Other Banks and S & L’s (Savings and Loan Associations for the younger crowd) held their loans in portfolio as investments.

The loan’s performance after closing was just as important to the lender as was the income realized from its origination.  Some loans were actually made at breakeven or a small loss just to bring on the servicing revenue or desired investment returns. Lenders were tied to their loans from beginning to end. They had a vested interest in the borrower making their payments.

Missed payments and defaults cost lenders money in lost anticipated income and in required advances into the loan pools. If a borrower, whose loan was in a Ginnie pool, missed a payment the servicing lender had to advance the required principal and interest payment to the pool.  Too many defaults could lead to a hefty required monthly advance. Not good for any lender.

Lenders had skin in the game. They needed ample net worth and access to capital to ensure they could cover advances and loan losses so they could stay in the game. With the advent of advanced secondary markets, the agencies, wholesale and correspondent lenders things changed.

The originating lender very rarely is the entity that retains and/or services the loan. Loans are aggregated with weighted averages to spread the risk and maximize the returns. Who ends up having skin in the game, and how much is exposed? All depends.

As a result of what happened with the crash of 2007/2008, Congress decided that all lenders, at every level, needed to share some risk.

If they did not have a direct risk/reward scenario from the loan’s origination, then they had the risk from regulatory requirements and the potential for fines and penalties when things weren’t done right.

So like or not, through CFPB and related regulations, Congress has ensured that everyone involved in the loan origination process now has a vested interest in a loan’s performance and in consumer protection. That’s not so bad.

After all, most lenders have always had these interests at heart, it’s just that they got a little off track when trying to expand the opportunities to more consumers to help them realize the American Dream. A noble cause but one that didn’t turn out so well.

Once again quality is king. Loan quality and performance is equally as important as loan originations and pricing. Everyone has some skin in the game. That’s why it’s so important to do things right, for all the right reasons.

Are you doing what you need to do to protect your skin?

More Insights

December 11, 2025

Automating Loan Quality Checks

Discover how LoanLogics’ loan quality management system transforms mortgage QC software, optimizing the mortgage process and detecting loan defects….

read more

July 30, 2025

The Container Revolution Comes to Mortgages: How CARBN is Transforming an Industry 

In 1956, Malcolm McLean watched as dockworkers laboriously loaded cargo piece by piece onto ships—a process that took weeks, invited theft, and made global…

read more

May 20, 2025

Smarter QC Workflows Start with Greater Access to Policy Intelligence

In a significant move to enhance quality control (QC) processes, Fannie Mae has expanded access to its AI-powered tool, Ask Poli, to include QC…

read more